One of their case-studies is Professor Steven Salaita. Like the general public, Cortina at al. Think again. Cortina at al. Already in April , Salaita charged Israel with undertaking one of the "most vicious civilian slaughters of this century. License plates are also color-coded based on the driver's religion. Only Jews are afforded the full benefits of citizenship. All Israelis are afforded full benefits and citizenship.
In his view, the boycott movement, aka Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions BDS has "the potential to topple a colonial empire… I will teach my son the history of Palestine. He will teach it to his children. Our stories will outlast Zionism. Why not?
- Immigration and Public Opinion in Liberal Democracies (Routledge Research in Comparative Politics);
- Church Discipline: How the Church Protects the Name of Jesus (9marks: Building Healthy Churches).
- Get Your Hands Dirty: Essays on Christian Social Thought (and Action);
- Step-by-step Art Deco Dove in Paper Sculpture (Step-by-step Paper Sculpture Book 2)!
- Chopstick: Forever Friends, Book 1.
Because Hamas isn't the one incinerating children, you disingenuous prick. Goebbels much? Cortina et al. It is quite clear that Salaita is anti-Semitic and would have upset Jewish students. But more to the point, abusive language should not be tolerated, no matter which segment of the society it targets. A few days ago, Prof.
Israel Academia Monitor
She explained that a BDS proposal was brought to her by some members of the Foundation and they requested a discussion on this topic. She decided to have an open meeting. She explained that there will be no vote on the BDS resolution at APSA this year because based on the Foundations by-laws, votes on new policy can only take place at the business meeting.
The business meeting is scheduled to lunchtime while the open meeting is later, in the evening. She explained about herself that throughout the years she has taken "no position on BDS or this particular resolution, neither in my capacity as chair of Foundations nor in my own scholarship. Never have I made any public statements about BDS. As indicated in the workshop brochure, the workshop was to question "Where is the line between the study of politics and an engagement with politics? What relationship should Political Scientists have with difficult political issues? The group was not happy that "APSA is prohibited from taking positions on political matters.
Marasco should pay attention to how these activists work to "capture" APSA. The answer is twofold: First, the resolution negates Israel's right to be a Jewish and democratic state. It states, "The conflation of Israel with either Judaism or Jewish people is both empirically inaccurate and ideologically objectionable to many Jewish people around the world.
The Rolling Stones
Negating this right is anti-Semitic. Second, it singles out Israel. It states, "It is true that the academic boycott resolution does specify and pertain solely to Israel. This is mischievous, if they don't want to be considered as anti-Semites, they should start with boycotting the most-worthy country to boycott first, and along with the list of countries to boycott, get down to boycott Israel.
But targeting only Israel is anti-Semitic. Those who attend the open meeting should address these issues. Accusations of "Scholasticide," that is, the "systematic destruction by Israeli forces of centres of education," are now resurfacing. It was coined in January by Prof.
In reality, things are a bit more complicated. Just days before the Hass Haaretz articles, on 2nd of July, Israeli security forces detained five Hamas operatives inside Birzeit University while raising money and recruiting activists. This was just another instance of a foiled Hamas attempt under the guise of students belonging to the Islamic bloc at Birzeit University. Members of the cell were arrested, and money was confiscated, including a vehicle funded by Hamas. The purpose was to raise funds and recruit new Hamas operatives to execute terror attacks in Judea and Samaria, as Hamas tries to establish itself within the West Bank.
Unsurprisingly, Hass did not mention the security angle of the story. Birzeit has a history of association with Hamas. Just recently, in March , about Palestinian students threw firebombs and rocks at Israeli soldiers who responded with tear gas and rubber-coated metal bullets. This protest broke out after Israeli forces, in a night-time raid, arrested three students at Birzeit University identified with the Islamist group. Shortly before that, in October , the Israeli security services said it arrested 3 members of Hamas terror network that has been recruited by a network of Hamas military wing members in the Gaza Strip to carry out attacks beyond the Green Line.
Their cell is alleged to have been established in and has been devoting efforts to recruit engineering students at Birzeit University. According to the Israeli security forces, the pair also underwent military training during their recruitment. Likewise, in March Israel arrested two Birzeit University students for receiving funds from Hamas.
In July Israel commemorated the 17th anniversary of the Hebrew University cafeteria bombing. Clearly, Israel's security concerns do not attract attention, instead, protesters present Israel as deliberately evil. Times Higher Education has reported on the prevention of visas, quoting Prof. These reports also ignore a racist law which surfaced in Birzeit University. Hass was told to leave because Birzeit University has passed a law making it illegal for Israelis to be present on the university grounds. This was highly ironic because Hass has been one of the staunchest defenders of the Palestinians.
Also worth noting that none of her articles paid any attention to the Hamas-Fatah bitter split inside Birzeit University. Gunshots were reported, but no one was injured. Enraged by what had happened, Birzeit students yelled at the security personnel and hurled insults about the PA, angering members of Fatah's student party, Shabiba. An altercation developed into a brawl.
The school canceled courses for the next day, and classes resumed two days later. The Islamic Bloc members at the West Bank universities say they are constantly hunted by Palestinian security forces due to the students' school activities designed to raise money from students. Yet, students who are arrested are often charged with serious crimes such as sectarian violence, libel, defamation, or even receiving funds from illicit parties or possessing weapons.
Hamza Abu Qaraa, a student and the Islamic Bloc's coordinator at Birzeit University, was also arrested in June by PA intelligence affiliates as they started shooting in the air, "they caught me, handcuffed me and beat me in the street. More than students from various West Bank universities have been arrested during the school year, Abu Qaraa said.
About 24 Birzeit students have been arrested since May, when the Islamic Bloc won student council elections for the fourth year in a row, in December But no one protests Palestinian security forces arresting students, only Israeli security forces. The timely accusations against Israel prompted also Israeli academics and peace activists to write a letter in protest to the leaderships of both the Hebrew and Ben Gurion Universities, stating "We are a group of faculty and emeriti concerned about the violation of the academic freedom of Palestinian universities as reflected in restrictions on exchange of students and lecturers with academic institutions abroad and employment of lecturers from abroad.
As you can see in the attached documents, this is not a single harm. We appeal to you to raise your voices against the systematic violation of academic freedom. We are very anxious about violating our academic freedom, but academic freedom is indivisible to national affiliation, and just as we are anxious about our freedom, we must be concerned of its prevention from our neighbors.
This is for moral and even selfish reasons: as history has taught us, those who are paralyzed while others are hurt end up being hurt as well. Amotz Agnon has initiated the letter. His partner Daphna Golan-Agnon has published an article a year ago, "Destroying Palestinian Universities" where she lamented that "Foreign lecturers as well as Palestinian lecturers who studied or taught abroad are being expelled from West Bank academic institutes with a form of bureaucratic violence.
In , Israel denied entry to two international lecturers with Birzeit contracts.
- Hebron - Wikipedia.
- Miss Irene Clearmont Presents.
- 114 FREE Kindle eBook Downloads!
- Hegel and the Third World: The Making of Eurocentrism in World History.
- Real Estate Investing - A Beginners Guide To Financial Freedom!
- The Drive LIVE Stream | Chicago;
- Hand In Hand With The Master!
Adalah plans to take the case to the Israeli High Court of Justice. IAM will report on the case in due course. APSA is the leading professional organization for the study of political science and serves more than 11, members in more than countries. It was founded in and brings together all fields of inquiry and regions to deepen understanding of politics, democracy, and citizenship.
Worth noting that the general director of the Doha Institute is Azmi Bishara, the former MK who is suspected of supplying information to Hezbollah. The article thanks them for their work. Publishing the article just a short period before the annual meeting aims to influence participants and to generate interest in holding a session and a vote for BDS. The Resolution is replete with distorted and bias information. It states that "We are acutely aware of the ways that Israeli academic institutions are complicit in Israel's settler colonization of Palestine, and the attendant ethnic cleansing, dispossession, military occupation, and apartheid policies that constitute this colonization.
Moreover, we are cognizant of the ways that this colonization consistently violates the academic freedom of Palestinian students and faculty to attend school, conduct research, and make contributions to knowledge. The colonization of Palestine is the silencing of Palestinian scholarly contributions to knowledge.
Be it also resolved that the Foundations of Political Theory supports the protected rights of students and scholars everywhere to engage in research and public speaking about Israel-Palestine and in support of the boycott, divestment and sanctions BDS movement. It asks "Plenty of other countries in the world engage in human rights violations. It is true that the academic boycott resolution does specify and pertain solely to Israel; however, this does not mean that Israel is the only country worth boycotting or that other boycotts should not be undertaken of other countries elsewhere in the world.
Israel is a state with many citizens, not all of whom are Jewish. Critiquing the actions of that state has nothing to do with criticizing or condemning its citizens, much less Judaism or Jewish people. Not only are not all Israelis Jewish, but not all Jewish people support Israel or aspire to become Israelis. The conflation of Israel with either Judaism or Jewish people is both empirically inaccurate and ideologically objectionable to many Jewish people around the world, who do not speak with one voice on the subject of Israel and are only presumed to do so by folks who think it reasonable to believe all Jews think alike.
It says, "Palestinians have the right to defend themselves. All too often this internationally recognized right of self-defense is mobilized solely with regard to Israel and used to justify its massive, disproportionate, genocidal brutalities in, for example, the Gaza Strip in response to rockets fired by Hamas, or in the West Bank in response to teenagers throwing stones at soldiers.
Yet the overall context of colonialism and occupation are never taken into account as the defining and precipitating factors of those rockets or stone-throwings. Palestinian violence can and should be understood as the exercise of the internationally recognized right of self-defense by a people facing eliminatory colonial and military violence. The FAQ sheet ends with the hope that the resolution is adopted, and we "inshallah, succeed in making some sort of political change, no matter how minimal. Pro-Palestinian activists are now trying to push their anti-Israel agenda by setting up sections and panels using a page from their strategy in other professional associations.